Which statement is true about conveying interest in jointly held property?

The accurate statement about conveying interest in jointly held property relates to how such a conveyance impacts the ownership structure. When an interest in jointly held property is conveyed to another party, it indeed disrupts the unities of time and title that are necessary for joint tenancy.

Joint tenancy is characterized by four unities: unity of time, unity of title, unity of interest, and unity of possession. For joint tenants to retain their rights of survivorship, all four unities must be maintained. Conveying an interest to a third party can break these unities, specifically affecting the unity of title—meaning that the joint tenants no longer hold the property in the same manner. This introduces a co-owner who is not a participant in the original joint tenancy, subsequently transforming the nature of the ownership and eliminating survivorship rights among the existing tenants.

In contrast, the other options inaccurately represent the effects of such a conveyance. Strengthening the unity of title or consolidating ownership among joint tenants are concepts that do not hold true when interests are conveyed. Additionally, stating that it does not affect survivorship misrepresents how conveyance changes the rights of joint tenants, as it directly disrupts their ability to transfer property seamlessly upon the death of a tenant